As enterprises continue to run mission-critical applications on IBM Z, storage management challenges are becoming more pressing. Your teams are expected to keep systems running flawlessly, even as workloads grow, costs rise, and environments become more complex.
Storage errors can disrupt production, reruns waste valuable time, and inefficient use of disk space drives up budgets. This means that effective storage management has become essential for maintaining performance, resilience, and cost control.
The Growing Challenge of IBM Z Storage
IBM Z environments are known for their reliability. But as your organization generates more data, the strain on your storage intensifies. Costs are rising, workloads are growing, and the talent needed to manage increasingly complex systems is becoming harder to find.
Storage costs alone illustrate the challenge. 90% of companies report that improving cost efficiency is a top concern¹. You’re likely being asked to do more with less – and many IBM Z organizations acknowledge that there is significant room for improvements in efficiency. In fact, an estimated 9-11% can be saved through smarter optimization and modernization efforts².
That pressure is magnified by the need to store more data, for longer periods of time – whether for compliance, analytics, or operational requirements – all without overwhelming your storage environment or budget.
The people side of the equation is just as pressing. Roughly 30% of organizations say they can’t hire the mainframe administration talent they need³. As a result, existing staff are stretched thin, devoting valuable time to troubleshooting storage issues instead of driving innovation.
Beyond these broader pressures, day-to-day storage management comes with own unique operational challenges.
- Fragmented or underutilized storage drives budgets higher than necessary
- Out-of-space errors can bring production workloads to a halt and trigger costly reruns.
- Administrators are left enforcing standards across diverse workloads, often spending more time firefighting issues than advancing strategic priorities.
These recurring pain points make it clear that storage inefficiencies directly affect business agility and resilience.
Why Traditional Approaches Fall Short
Many existing practices rely heavily on manual intervention and reactive fixes. For example, when a dataset fails due to insufficient disk space, the result is often a scramble to rerun jobs, reassign volumes, or manually recover space. These approaches not only waste time but also increase the risk of compounding errors.
Modern workloads — ranging from legacy JCL to high-volume transactional systems — are complex. And this makes reactive approaches unsustainable. Today, your business needs smarter ways to automate, standardize, and optimize storage usage.
Smarter Strategies for Storage Efficiency
How are forward-looking organizations rethinking storage management? With three priorities in mind:
- Preventing errors before they happen.
Proactive detection and recovery from space issues ensures production workloads aren’t interrupted by out-of-space errors or abends. - Automating routine tasks.
From enforcing dataset naming standards to dynamically reallocating space, automation reduces administrative burden while ensuring consistency. - Establishing governance and consistency at scale.
Clear standards for dataset creation, naming, placement, and allocation help prevent fragmentation and ensure predictability across storage environments. Strong governance not only streamlines operations but also enables organizations to scale with confidence as workloads grow more complex.
Real-World Impact: Benefits for IBM Z Teams
When your organization takes a more proactive and integrated approach to storage management, the benefits quickly become clear. Consider the impact of outcomes like these on your day-to-day operations and overall long-term resilience:
- Fewer disruptions. Nearly all out-of-space errors and abends that once caused jobs to fail? They can be prevented before they even occur – eliminating costly reruns.
- Lower costs. Optimizing disk usage ensures that you don’t pay for capacity that you’re not fully using. Smarter capacity management can have a substantial impact on your bottom line.
- Reduced manual effort. With automation handling recovery, allocation, and standards enforcement, your storage teams can spend less time on repetitive tasks and more time addressing higher-value initiatives. This shift helps you overcome talent shortages by making better use of existing resources – something that’s especially critical at a time when many are struggling to hire skilled IBM Z administrators.
- Improved resilience. Smarter allocation and recovery not only protect against failures, but also keep your systems running smoothly under heavy load. Any interruption in mainframe processing, no matter how small, can be very expensive. So, investments in resilience have significant ROI.
These outcomes directly address the needs of your storage administrators, operations staff, and business leaders who depend on IBM Z for mission-critical reliability – avoiding costly outages, reducing operational expenses, and enabling teams to stay focused on driving value.
Take The Next Steps
The demands on IBM Z storage will only intensify. Organizations are being asked to store more data for longer periods, often across hybrid environments that combine mainframe and cloud.
At the same time, staffing challenges show no signs of easing.
These pressures make efficiency and automation non-negotiable. By investing in smarter storage practices now, you’ll position your organization to handle tomorrow’s workloads with greater resilience, agility, and confidence.
If your organization is feeling the strain of IBM Z storage management, now’s the time to take a closer look at how you can prevent failures, automate routine tasks, and strengthen governance to get more from your storage investments.
Want insights into best practices for reducing risk, improving efficiency, and unlocking greater value?
Join the upcoming webinar, Introducing Syncsort™ Storage Management on October 7.
Planet Mainframe Market Survey — April 2025¹
Kyndryl — Mainframe Modernization is Driving More Than $12B Collective Cost Savings Survey²
Network World — March 5, 2024³
0 Comments